3Back
“Refreshing, Practical Approach”
Refreshing, practical approach. Great exercises! Fun.
“Doug Kept Class Interesting”
Doug was professional, informed and engaging. Kept the class interesting and provided real world examples.
“Great Job”
If you asked me to review at the end of day 1, my evaluation would have been 1/2 as the concepts had not come together or made sense yet to me. However, the recap and hands on work done on day 2 brought it all together. Great job!
“Enjoyed The New Perspective”
I enjoyed the new (to me) perspective on Scrum. I appreciated Doug took the time to cover Technical Debt as well.
“Doug Conveyed Topics Well”
Great mixture of lecture, bookwork, and group activities. Doug was entertaining, conveyed topics well and at the right pace.
“Very Good Information”
The Scrum information is very good. However, we are currently using Waterfall with a Team of BA [Business Analysts], Dev [Developers], and QA [Quality Analysts]. We do estimates, schedules, and a lot of things. I don't think I understand how the entire Waterfall fits into Scrum. Many things are bot a part of Scrum. The happen elsewhere. I am just confused as to where exactly.
“Enjoyable And Thought Provoking”
I thought the class covered the right information for my needs/wants. It was enjoyable and thought provoking.
“Kept Us Very Engaged”
Very useful information - very much liked the instructor's style - kept us very engaged.
“Understood The Core Concepts”
Good. Understood the core concepts. Answered the questions satisfactory.
“Course Was Very Organized”
The course was very well organized with a great balance between theory and practical application. Dr. Dan was also great answering questions and providing "real-world" insights.