Great Course
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: June 6, 2013

Great Course

Suggested improvements:

A little bit more about sizing/estimating the stories.


See Handwritten Review
Great
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Suggested improvements:


See Handwritten Review
Good Interactive Course
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Good interactive course but I wanted more explanation of the concepts and more practice on them e.g. user stories, tasking, sprint cycle. In addition, I also wanted to discuss implementing Agile & Scrum in a large organization.

Suggested improvements:


See Handwritten Review
Answered My Questions
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Good insights into various parts of Scrum development. Answered my questions.

Suggested improvements:

Coffee in the afternoon. No boxed lunches (gourmet food) Facility issue.


See Handwritten Review
I Appreciate
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

The biggest benefits I'm taking home are the conversations I had during those 2 days. I appreciate all the shared experience.

Suggested improvements:

Recap of first day on second day..."What did we learn yesterday?" Consolidated overview of Scrum Master's responsibilities.


See Handwritten Review
Excellent Course
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

All in all an excellent course. I will recommend the 3Back course to friends and colleagues.

Suggested improvements:

Story Points!


See Handwritten Review
Lots of Good Info
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Lots of good info, simulation, exercises. Especially valuable.

Suggested improvements:

Interruptive people doesn't demonstrate respect. Stop it!


See Handwritten Review
Good Job
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Dan did a good job with the subject matter and is obviously passionate about the topic.

Suggested improvements:

Not waiting for one group to start the class. The rest of the class should not be punished because one table is late.


See Handwritten Review
Good Understanding
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

Good understanding of P.O. & SM Good collab sessions. Good backlog discussions.

Suggested improvements:

More about team dynamic (especially cotlocated teams)


See Handwritten Review
Very Valuable
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: October 25, 2012

As an architect I thought this was very valuable in terms of aligning how I approach coaching teams. My goal is to improve my team's ability to deliver quality products. I think the principles we discussed helped me align my thoughts about that.

Suggested improvements:


See Handwritten Review