Informative And Interactive
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

The class was very informative and interactive. Liked the activities that took place during the class. The coach made the class more fun. Liked his way of teaching by using various analogy and examples from his own life.

Suggested improvements:

Improvements? I think it was great. But only that the instructor should personally review the activity of "creating a product" since the team had a lot of confusion during the activity.


See Handwritten Review
Loved The Interaction With The Coach
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

-Loved the interaction with the coach and those I sat with at my table.
-Content was real world examples that were applied and explained well.
-When attendee/class had questions coach was willing to answer and didn't seem bothered by multiple questions.

Suggested improvements:


See Handwritten Review
Excellent Job
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Excellent job. Very helpful, and interesting class.

Suggested improvements:

Time for sprint exercises could benefit from some additional time to be able to work through initial planning due to participant learning.


See Handwritten Review
Enjoy Practicing Scrum
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

It was a good class, enjoy practicing Scrum during the first day. The second day dragged a bit.

Suggested improvements:

Instructor move around to different teams during the exercise. Help provide feedback if teams had questions.


See Handwritten Review
Highly Recommend
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Instructor is very engaging; interesting class. I would highly recommend anyone taking it, even if they are not [in] software to learn about agile.

Suggested improvements:

Mention ways that this framework can be implemented on non-software scenarios.


See Handwritten Review
Overall Good
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Overall good
Some conversations not necessarily relevant

Suggested improvements:

Maybe have more instructor input in some of the team discussions.


See Handwritten Review
Engaging Instructor
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Good info, good examples and engaging instructor (Dan).

Suggested improvements:

Not so many examples, there was 3-4 every topic. It felt like the content was stretched out and could have been done in a day.


See Handwritten Review
Information Easy To Digest
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Good information. Dan is a great instructor and is full of great stories. It makes the information easy to digest with real stories to relate it to.

Suggested improvements:

1 day course or 1.5 days


See Handwritten Review
In Favor Of A More Broad Approach
By: Scrum Training Review


Review: December 1, 2016

Suggested improvements:

I would be interested to see less focus on scrum for software development projects, in favor of a more broad approach for many types of engineering and technical projects and how scrum could be applied.


See Handwritten Review